What was wrong with MGM for the past few years. Here is one point of view i want to note:
"Part of MGM's problem has always been that many of its owners are financial players more focused on the short term than the long term..Being in the entertainment industry is typically a long-term play because of the nature of distribution and massive amounts of capital needed." - Clark Hallren - Wall Street Journal, October 28, 2010.
And here is my point of view. MGMs problems were not from yesterday. First came Kirik Kerkorian and his "great" move - to hire James Thomas Audrey, Jr. as a president of the company (the 3rd one for that year)What Audrey "helped" with for MGM to all these years he was a president: 1. Relocating the company's headquarter from NYC to Culver City, and closing hundreds of jobs. 2. Ordering the sales of MGM's most valuable collections, such as costumes and prop. 3. Planning for making low-budget films (under $1 million). OK, that makes profits, and MGM comes out of the bottom with $16 millions in 1971. But what nobody think about is - this is only for a short-term period. Yes, you made it JT, but on what cost - most of the inexpensive movies forced a wave of criticism. And what can you think about a company, if its own director don't respect its valuable history: "the buck had to stop somewhere, and it was with me. Nostalgia runs strong out here, so we were criticized for selling Judy Garland's red shoes. To us they had no value, and they had no intrinsic value." Well, at least he could say that another way.
Next comes Ted Turner, who bought MGM from Kerkorian, and after selling the MGM lot and lab facilities, he traded back the company to Kerkorian. Later on MGM, still with high debt, bought Seven Network and Metromedia's film subsidiaries. With even more debt the company bought 20% of Cablevision. Wrong moves, MGM, wrong moves. So what is the reason to see the MGM Bankruptcy now? They didn't focus well! If you do something, do it right. I mean you can't make class movies, low-budget movies, to have a TV channel, to own a hotel and etc., and to expect no problems at all.If something goes wrong, just sell it (remember what happened with IBM and their attempt to develop laptops). MGM was a brand for class movies such as "Gone with the Wind", "The Bond" movies, "The Wizard of Oz", and it had to stay that way. Why on Earth they had to spend millions of dolars on MGM-TV and low-budget movies??? MGM-TV was a total disaster - movies from past. Come on, we are in the 21st century - the era of 3D and reality shows. If you want to be among the competition, you can not rely on old laurels.
DO ONE THING, BUT DO IT AT YOUR BEST!
Sources: Wikipedia.org, WSJ.com